A FAIR amount of wittering may be expected of the proposal to give MPs a salary increase of ten per cent. All of it would be justified as public sector pay increases have been pegged at one per cent and plenty of private sector employees have had shorter shrift from their own guv'nors.
Of course, we no longer have the unseemly spectacle of MPs making their own collective pay award. The words noses and trough sprang readily to mind.
But even though these things are now decided externally, by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority, a rise from £67,060 to £74,000 will not go down well with the long-suffering electorate.
It's a point understood in the wholesome reaction of right-stuff local MPs Lilian Greenwood and Vernon Coaker. And, of course, it is entirely possible that their declarations that they will give their pay rises to local good causes will be remembered next May.
Putting political cynicism aside, it would be artless for MPs to accept such an award not because of its size, but because of its timing. Notwithstanding the choruses of "Happy days are here again" wafting from the piano rooms of 10 and 11 Downing Street, the economic recovery is a gradual one.
Finding work, never mind long-term work that keeps a car on the drive and a holiday in the family diary, remains difficult for many people. They won't want crocodile tears from politicians who have just folded an extra seven large into their handbags and wallets.
However, if we remove the current political and economic context from the debate and ask if £74,000 is a reasonable reward for diligent MPs working in their constituencies' and the nation's interests, and especially bearing in mind the hours, I would say no. It should be more.
It's hard to be exact on what is a fair sum. We don't want it so low that we only get chimps. We don't want it so high that people stand for the wrong reasons.
But if you measure £74,000 against the earnings of a secondary school headteacher or a modestly successful barrister (or, to judge from my last car service, a garage mechanic) you could argue that MPs are under-paid.
Of course, that would not apply to the bone-idle, but it would be up to constituency parties to decide if they were getting value and de-select the lead-swingers as necessary.
If my MP is doing a £100,000 job, that is what I would wish him to receive.
However, times remain tough. The last seven years have been hard on most people in the labour market, many of whom have had pay freezes for year after year.
Like the rest of us, MPs should be made to wait for a fair deal – but when the country can afford it, a fair deal is what they should have.