Thousands of Nottingham residents are living in sub-standard council houses, according to new figures.
A Freedom of Information Request found that in the last financial year, 6.5 per cent of properties owned by Nottingham City Homes (NCH) did not meet Government targets for what constitutes "a minimum standard of decency".
This includes having modern bathrooms, kitchens, boilers and decent insulation. The figures show that 1,788 houses within NCH's portfolio did not meet the decent homes standards set out nationally.
But the organisation – which manages Nottingham City Council's rented and leasehold homes – said its houses were improving and more homes make the grade now than at any other time since 2011. Between 2011-2012, the number of properties meeting the standard was 19,759.
As of December 2014, the organisation manages 27,144 homes. NCH has blamed problems with releasing funding to make improvements, saying projects are now under way and it is confident all houses will be completed by March 31.
NCH said the work is made up of elements like kitchens, bathrooms, windows, doors, heating and roofs with some properties only requiring a single element to bring them up to standard.
Steve Edlin, assistant director of asset management at NCH, said: "I think Nottingham City Homes has done all it can to bring quality for its residents.
"The message is that we have a programme, it's on top and we're on target to reach that by 2015. If anyone has a problem, ring us up and let us know."
But residents told the Post about the bad experiences they have had. Top Valley resident Gemma Hemsley, 25, said she was forced to sleep in her living room after mould took over the walls in her bedroom.
She said she had been living with the problem for months before the housing provider stepped in. "It was like this for the past year or so," she said. "It's my health at risk, I've not been well. I've had bad anxiety, panic attacks, bad breathing problems.
"They just don't seem bothered, if you have a concern. I think it's shocking."
Daniel Finegan has lived in the NCH-managed Victoria Centre flats for more than 20 years. He said his home was affected repeatedly by flooding.
Mr Finegan said: "It's been flooded about five times and the last was about four or five weeks. It took a long time to replaster the ceiling.
"They're good at keeping the corridors clean but that's about it." NCH falls behind other housing groups in the East Midlands who have managed to hit the target for all their properties over the same time period.
Derby Homes, which manages Derby City Council council houses and estates, said all of its homes made the grade and that it is now "working steadily towards a higher standard".
Leicester City Council, which owns 21,956 properties, has met the standard from 2011-2014, although these figures only reflect surveys up until January 1 2014.
The decent homes criteria states that all social housing is free of health and safety hazards, in a reasonable state of repair with modern kitchens, bathrooms, boilers and insulation.
Local councils have been given £1.6 billion to help them meet this standard between 2011-2015. In addition, a further £160 million has been set aside for 2015-2016.
In a report published in 2006, NCH performed poorly in a review by the Audit Commission, denying it £165 million in funding to make improvements. The commission raised concern about senior and middle managers, the delivery of services, poor financial controls and a lack of transparency and accountability.
The organisation later passed, which led to the release of more than £200 million in combined Government and city council cash to go on the housing stock.
But the home provider had to reapply for this following the election of the coalition Government.
Other issues have included being unable to access properties to make repairs and improvements.
According to Mr Edlin, residents had been contacted at homes which required work. He said: "It's the funding to bring it up to Decent Homes Standard which all councils have done around the county.
"Nottingham City Homes has done as much as it can. It's worked with the residents [and] with its council who campaigned with them to keep funding with the coalition."
The Post says...In any analysis of the performance of Nottingham City Homes it's important to recognise the great strides that it has made in the past few years.
This was a badly-run organisation with a dismal reputation and a poor housing stock to go with it. In short, it had a mountain to climb and far too many of its tenants were living in properties which fell far below an acceptable standard.
So the legacy of substantially below par performance is the context against which we report today's news that 1,788 of its 27,144 properties still don't meet a government target for a minimum standard of decency.
This is a big improvement on 2011, when only 19,759 met the standard. But it is still too many, and the idea that families are having to live in properties which are neither heated nor equipped to an acceptable level isn't one a 21st century city can be comfortable with.
Tenants still tell stories of mouldy rooms and flooding, the time it takes to get problems solved, and figures show that NCH lags similar organisations in Derby and Leicester, which have managed to hit the government target already.
NCH has had a lot of ground to make up and whether we like it or not allowances have to be made for that and government-inspired funding changes.
Managers say that the organisation has a programme in place to solve these problems and will do so by the end of March.
That moment can't come soon enough and it is unfortunate that Nottingham City Homes' disastrous past still haunts its tenants today.
![Thousands of Nottingham residents living in sub-standard council houses Thousands of Nottingham residents living in sub-standard council houses]()